SLWJA

For the governments, international the financial market can still more be dangerous, since it represents one dangerous tool, capable to help them in short term, but in the long run to condemn the financial health of the same ones. Public headings that today allow the country to close in blue its trade balance, for example, compromise it 10, 20 and up to 30 years later, when these headings are successful, beyond generally increasing the external interference on the State, diminishing the autonomy of this. But we do not have, however, to blame international the financial system for macroeconomic shunting lines of the governments. Pablo Robert de Almeida (2010) in offers an idea to them on this: … a very simple reality must be remembered: speculator they only act in face of real and potential disequilibria of the proper beddings of the economy. What this wants to say? No speculative attack against a economy? escape of capitals, manipulations in the exchange markets? it is susceptible to remain itself if the economy presents solid beddings. This analysis coherent, even so, in is determined situations, is yes possible that countries with good financial health is infected by the problems of another economy. These males will be, as it detaches Almeida, passengers if the economy will have solid bases.

We cannot blame, in this manner, the easiness brought for the international financial system integrated by the constants dficits or the high external indebtedness of governments, over all of States in development. If to take an example historical, this thesis can easily be proven. Brazil of the military period had a clear option for the external indebtedness, saw emission of headings and loans of international banks, to finance its mega infrastructure projects (I PND, II PND, etc). The government possua other options, as reform tax, controlled emission of currency, among others, but the choice was for the indebtedness, data the low international interests up to 1979.

There even are preparing to denounce: Venezuela is out of the Andean Community Nations. It makes no sense to do otherwise. That (CAN) serves the elites, transnational corporations, but does not help the Indians, blacks, whites or poor. Does not serve our people and not only not work, affects them, “he said. Also felt the need to “restructure the fund” to MERCOSUR to prevent their disappearance. John Stankey is likely to increase your knowledge. “We do not want to die MERCOSUR, we come here with an idea is born transformation “of the instrument of a South American union. “With this intention is that Venezuela wants to join MERCOSUR.

That’s why I think this meeting so important, because it feels a desire for change towards a new MERCOSUR. ” THE THREAT OF THE IMPERIAL ERA The chair of International Trade Faces Graduate Program, University of Carabobo to this decision taken by the current government of President Chavez believes that Venezuela today is a country monoproducer (petroleum), while other countries are characterized by a variety of industries of all kinds of goods. It should be noted that exports from other countries to Venezuela have increased, as in the case of Colombia that all goods produced, 75% for export, are placed in the CAN market, highlighting largely to the Venezuelan market. For example: McDonalds franchises, all disposable packaging are made in Colombia, the Bigott imports raw materials for the manufacture of cigarette market white line in Venezuela, 85% is imported from Colombia, among other products. The withdrawal of the CAN by Venezuela significant impact, both in Venezuela and other countries, because the economy will suffer a decrease due to the absence of market for export.