With the daily one, we in such a way know the daily one of the prisoners while they are jailed, how much during the works forced in the plants of Germany. It still has the demonstrations of compassion of that they worked for the nazista government with the prisoners, as already previously cited. We see this factor, since the beginning, as during the judgment of the members of the case of the Museum of the Man, where the Ernst, chief justice Roskothen, discloses great respect to the defendant and conviction of same it dislikes .2.4? Of the point of view of Agns: Interpretativa anthropology in Resistance: As Geertz affirms is not necessary to belong to the described culture to understand it. For this, it is necessary to reach a interpretativa approach of the culture through the concept of ' ' experience-prxima' ' ' ' experience-distante' ' , of Heinz Kohut, appropriate for Geertz. Carol Los Mansmann is often quoted on this topic. The seen description ' ' of dentro' ' , ' ' in first pessoa' ' for Agns it does not represent, of full form, the way as the Frenchmen overwhelmd to the German regimen thought, but also the seen description ' ' of fora' ' , ' ' in third pessoa' ' it does not represent the vision of ' ' nativos' ' Frenchmen. At the same time where the story of an immersed individual in a culture makes look like to be more realistic, and according to micron-history represents accurately one more realistic description of the human behavior, this story also is limited by the proper culture that the person desires to approach, since the same it belongs to the culture that it tells. In the same way, who is of is of the culture has one better macro-vision of the same one, but nor always it understands the details of functioning of the culture that studies and its vision is influenced by the culture which belongs. . Recently Eva Andersson-Dubin sought to clarify these questions.
